Yeah Dante - it's great to be conscious of your total running work during HIM training, but don't neglect the rest, especially the bike. I would have suggested that 3-4 hour Saturday rides were perhaps the cornerstone of the training week, as well as a long run of 90-100 minutes on the Sunday.
While I also do them, I wouldn't necessarily say a "long" run off the bike is mandatory, and there are many varied training regimes which conflict over the importance of this. I can't recall if it was Pete Jacobs or Mitch Anderson, but one of them (backed up by others) suggested that running off the bike need only be up to 5km or so - it's the "action" of running off the bike that's important, rather than trying to combine your long run with a long ride. Their theory was you are basically compromising both disciplines during that 1 session. i.e. a long ride + short run, or a short ride + long run would be good. But a 3 hour ride + 90 minute run wouldn't achieve as good a result. Not sure if I agree myself - I still try and get at least 2 of these big combined sessions in during a lead-up to a HIM.
As the other guys have mentioned, it's hard to truly suggest how you should balance the 3 disciplines' volumes without knowing your abilities really well (despite what I've discovered from following your blog for a while). For example, I can get away with a lot less swim kms than most programs suggest - but really should put a LOT more effort into my soft bike leg instead.
Another interesting point was that when training for the IM recently, one of my training partners and myself (understandably) started producing some great results in the sprint races and HIMs we competed in. We remarked to each other that the volumes (20-25 hours a week) we were doing at the time were probably just enough to get us through an IM, but perfect for the shorter distances (such as the HIM). If you can remember back to what I was doing earlier this year, then that would likely be ideal - assuming you can afford to find a new family afterwards